you're reading...
My Paper

Evaluating The Finer Aspects Of The Lift Upgrading Programme (LUP)

This petition comes after residents at Blocks 411, 415 and 417 in Eunos Road 5 asked HDB to tear down the lift shafts built under the LUP, as they blocked light and made homes too dark” (Residents Petition Against LUP, Miss Sia Ling Xin).

I read with intrigue the report, “Residents Petition Against LUP” (June 18, 2010), by Miss Sia Ling Xin; particularly because it has been traditionally assumed that the Lift Upgrading Programme (LUP) has been considerably well-received by flat owners in respective estates since its inception in 2001. With a seventy-five percent majority amongst Singaporean households in the housing blocks, residents would be able to enjoy enhancements to their lift systems: refurbished interiors, lifts stopping at every level, and more reliable carriages.

The LUP is a well-intentioned initiative, designed to complement existing home improvement and upgrading projects offered to flats released by the Housing and Development Board (HDB). Nevertheless, the LUP did come under intense scrutiny in 2006 during the General Elections, when opposition parties and politicians accused the incumbent administration of adopting carrot-and-stick strategies to garner more votes. Such concerns were somewhat addressed when the opposition-held wards of Hougang and Potong Pasir were eligible for the LUP; though some highlighted the lateness of the announcement and the overall timing of the decision.

Beyond the political implications, the LUP has seen its fair share of criticisms and complaints during the construction and eventual implementation phases. Residents across the islands have previously reflected the inconvenience brought about initially; and while noise and dust pollution are inevitable, the extensive experience HDB has with its constructors should have allowed it to control or limit such externalities. It should take into serious consideration complaints that compromise safety and security – as highlighted in the report – such as boards blocking light and ventilation, construction sites not properly secured, and tools such as scaffoldings left lying around carelessly.

Furthermore, much more can be done in terms of maintenance. Despite the seemingly positive results reflected by the recent Town Council reports, it is undeniable that the study has failed to capture some areas or instances where lifts are not checked for hygiene and cleanliness. The employed Town Council cleaners do conduct the basic daily sweeping within the interior, but are they tasked to also clean the button-boards and walls? If the threats of fines and installation of security cameras have failed to deter individuals from casually littering their cigarette butts and even urinating in the lifts, should HDB work more closely with the respective Town Councils to devise feasible alternatives?

In the long run, the LUP should not be perceived as a one-off upgrading. Constant checks and inspections must be conducted meticulously so that minor faults or defects can be looked into immediately. A more thorough engagement of ground sentiments during planning or post-implementation phases would allow HDB to render its projects more wholesome, taking into account genuine concerns and elevating the status quo.

A version of this article was published in My Paper.

About guanyinmiao

A man of knowledge lives by acting, not by thinking about acting. Carlos Castaneda.


3 thoughts on “Evaluating The Finer Aspects Of The Lift Upgrading Programme (LUP)

  1. I was lucky to find your guanyinmiao.wordpress.com blog. Aw, this is a really quality post. In theory I’d like to write like this too – taking time and real effort to make a good article… but what can I say… I procrastinate alot and never seem to get something done.

    Posted by Roho | April 26, 2011, 1:45 am


  1. Pingback: Daily SG: 24 Jun 2010 « The Singapore Daily - June 24, 2010

  2. Pingback: Weekly Roundup: Week 26 « The Singapore Daily - June 26, 2010

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow guanyinmiao's musings on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,404 other followers


%d bloggers like this: