you're reading...
The Straits Times

Emerging From Educational Conformity And The Comforts Of The Status Quo

The lack of creativity among Singaporeans is due largely to the need to conform, and the fear of failure” (No Template For Creativity, Mr. Tan Jiaqi).

The letter “No Template For Creativity” (December 18, 2010) by Mr. Tan Jiaqi makes the excellent observation that the considerable absence of creativity among Singaporeans stem not merely from the pressures within classrooms, but also from socio-economic circumstances. Far from being an exclusive Singaporean problem, educators around the world are beginning to recognise that the international education system – one that emphasises rote-learning and the regurgitation of information in tests and examinations – is stifling young minds and limiting the application of creative methodologies. The situation is far more pronounced in Singapore – especially with our limited manpower – where parents and students’ expectations are premised upon the need to be economically-productive in the future, fuelled by materialism and pragmatism.

Conformity is encouraged from the moment a child enters primary school. Not only are they exposed to standardised assessments and pressures in the form of competition and academic excellence, they are also forced to go through an academic framework which places disproportionate emphasis on memorisation and rigid teaching-learning processes. A child who is interested in arts and craft, in music, or in sports has little avenues to explore these areas. Creativity is almost non-existent, as pedagogies focus more on the transfer of information, rather than imparting skills or encouraging interactivity.

The national formula of education needs a drastic reshuffle. Over the years, teachers and parents should have gradually comprehended that harshly penalising a student or child for faring badly in a standardised examination has generated unwanted ramifications. People see no need to challenge the status quo because of its track record; yet they do not see how the have-nots have been struggling to keep up with unrealistic standards and expectations. Our society treats differences with disdain, and expects everyone to turn out exactly the same; even though we truthfully know that it is an impossible ideal. The message: not every kid is meant to be an academic, and should not be educated like one.

The problem is compounded when education is seen merely as a means to an end; the end being landing a good job, and relishing in the comforts of wealth and material gains. For instance, while co-curricular activities and leadership boards were instituted to help students further their interests and have a hand in organising events and conventions, many have become obsessed with beefing up their curriculum vitae and portfolios, so as to “look good” in scholarship and college applications. Even something like community service has been abused for personal, pragmatic purposes.

Creativity will only be achieved when an individual is given the freedom and liberty to play to his strengths, and interest himself with endeavours or areas that he is passionate and talented in. The true measure of a student comes with the application of what he has learnt; combined with what he truly enjoys and excels in. And the institution’s role? To equip generic skills: linguistic, oratorical, written et cetera to help reach that goal.

A version of this article was published in The Straits Times.

About guanyinmiao

A man of knowledge lives by acting, not by thinking about acting. Carlos Castaneda.


3 thoughts on “Emerging From Educational Conformity And The Comforts Of The Status Quo

  1. Good post on creativity vs conformity (reliance on traditon/status quo past the point of reason)….an affirmation of Emerson’s old nuggest: “A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.”

    Posted by theteachingwhore | December 24, 2010, 11:00 am
  2. I don’t think our education system prepares people to be academics either. As an academic you are involved mainly in teaching and research. Research is inherently a creative activity and one which is difficult to carry out without large stores of curiosity and internal motivation. Our education system stifles creativity and curiosity, and relies on external motivators rather than internal motivators. Needless to say it doesn’t instill much in the way of teaching skills either.

    Posted by Ponder Stibbons | January 3, 2011, 9:16 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow guanyinmiao's musings on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,404 other followers


Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

%d bloggers like this: