you're reading...
Community Service Review

School-Based Community Service In Singapore: Consolidation

This is the conclusion to a three part series on school-based community service in Singapore. The first part deals with broad concepts of community service in Singapore (here, April 20, 2012); the second touches on the Community Involvement Programme (here, April 23, 2012); the third highlights Service-Learning, and the other concerns (here, April 25, 2012). Because this series revolves exclusively around recommendations, do read this document (here) to get a brief idea of what school-based community service in Singapore encompasses.

Community Service (Flickr -Jeffrey-)

* * *

After three separate entries, I thought I would just take the opportunity to quickly consolidate all the main points in a single entry, based on what has been expounded on throughout the past week.

Reaffirming the Value of School-Based Community Service in Singapore (here)
– The CIP should continue to be compulsory because of the host of benefits associated with the programme, and should thus perceived as a springboard for future activities.
– In schools, we need to broaden the understanding of “community service”.
– There needs to be better follow-up on programmes with capacity-building networks, to allow students to spiral upwards.
– Students should recognise that CIP and SL goes beyond the portfolio, and hence develop a greater appreciation for their activities and contributions.

The Community Involvement Programme (here)
– Diversify the programme: heighten the quality of service, offer more variety in participation, make activities complementary, and have schools be more flexible and receptive to different alternatives.
– CIP activities should not be “one-off”; there must be follow-ups.
– Increase the quality of reflection and feedback exercises, and also involve the non-profits in the post-event evaluations.
– Most significantly, it would be productive to involve teachers and parents in the entire process.

Service Learning (here)
– More resources and manpower can be given to education institutions to develop economies of scale. Community partners, such as elderly citizens, can also be invited to participate.
– Maximise the engagement with the non-profits, instead of engaging in one-off initiatives.
– There can be the development of a comprehensive CIP and SL catalogue, or resource portal for students, schools and teachers.
–  There should be sustained collaboration between school administrators, educators and a variety of non-profits, so as to review progress continuously, as well as to bring about inter-school cooperation.

About guanyinmiao

A man of knowledge lives by acting, not by thinking about acting. Carlos Castaneda.


No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow guanyinmiao's musings on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,403 other followers


%d bloggers like this: