you're reading...

Explanations For The Increase In School Fees

These fees will increase by between S$20 to S$60 per month for students who are permanent residents, and by between S$20 to S$150 per month for international students” (Schools Fees For PRs And Foreigners To Increase From 2016, Toh Ee Ming).

Taken from https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8c/Singapore_Sports_School_6,_Jul_07.JPG.

Most will agree on the need for differentiation between the permanent residents, international students, and Singapore citizens, but to what extent?

Besides the generic explanation that the Ministry of Education (MOE) wishes to “further differentiate fees by citizenship” – the same proffered in 2013, the last time school fees were raised for students who are permanent residents and for international students – perhaps more information can be provided on the regularity and some details of the periodic review. From the 2016, the increase will range between S$20 and S$150 per month (TODAY, Oct. 1).

Most will agree on the need for differentiation between the permanent residents, international students, and Singapore citizens, but to what extent? How did the MOE arrive at these numbers, and how have the fees changed over the years?

Less attention has been paid to this announcement by the MOE, because school fees for Singaporean students have not been changed, and general education – in addition to the financial assistance schemes and bursaries available – remains highly subsidised. However, clarity on the increases will be useful for the disgruntled parents, many of whom have been reported to be “unhappy with the decision”. Furthermore, the generalisation that permanent residents and foreigners are necessarily wealthy is not true too. Over the period of a ten year education in the primary and secondary schools, the accumulated fees are significant, and could deter these parents from sending their children to local schools.

What might also put the rising fees in context is the number of permanent residents and international students who will be affected in 2016. News reports are still premised upon anecdotes, and reactions of the interviewees seem to vary based on their household incomes and corresponding abilities to pay. Numbers from MOE in this regard would be helpful.

A version of this article was published in TODAY.

About guanyinmiao

A man of knowledge lives by acting, not by thinking about acting. Carlos Castaneda.



  1. Pingback: Daily SG: 5 Oct 2015 | The Singapore Daily - October 5, 2015

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow guanyinmiao's musings on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,404 other followers


  • RT @instagram: We want your friends to focus on the photos and videos you share, not how many likes they get. You can still see your own li… 14 minutes ago
  • RT @instagram: We’re currently running a test that hides the total number of likes and video views for some people in the following countri… 14 minutes ago
  • RT @dog_rates: This is Smoltz and Maddux. They often match their smiles, and on special occasions they even match their shirts. Both 14/10… 15 minutes ago
  • RT @napiez: Good job. Now raise the minimum marriage age to 18 nationally. twitter.com/SyedSaddiq/sta… 16 minutes ago
  • RT @jamesrbuk: These are *disposable* single-use phone chargers and may be the most grotesque product I’ve ever seen on sale. Why on Earth… 18 minutes ago
%d bloggers like this: