//
you're reading...
The Straits Times

Throwback: #GE2015: Reductive Analyses Of Social Media

Taken from http://www.todayonline.com/sites/default/files/styles/photo_gallery_image_lightbox/public/23513019.JPG?itok=kdYCiz8Y.

What might be a plausible hypothesis on the role of social media is that engagement is perceived to be a given by the voter, also evidenced by the increased activity on the part of the PAP and its candidates.

A poor commentary about the supposed impact of social media was published after the general elections in 2015, and I argued that additional research and hypotheses were needed before any reasonable conclusions could be made.

Read “#GE2015: Reductive Analyses Of Social Media” (a version of the article was also published in The Straits Times), and here’s a short excerpt:

“Without meaningful information about data usage and content publication during the campaign period or the perceptions of Internet users on political content, analysts who seek to explain a “social media effect” following the recent general elections appear to be grasping at straws. And few of these analysts also account for the diverse motivations which influence the way Singaporeans consume or make use of content available on online platforms.

One of these recent arguments is that “the rise of social media may have eclipsed the importance of voting the opposition into parliament because social media has provided an effective means for individual Singaporeans to speak their views directly to those in power” (ST, Sept. 16). First, it seems unlikely for individuals to have assumed that their freedom to articulate perspectives on the Internet is equivalent to – or as effective as – questions or motions raised by parliamentarians. Second, it is not necessarily true that members of parliament and ministers of the People’s Action Party (PAP) are “accessible round the clock via their Facebook pages”. If “accessible” means the ability to post or send messages, then yes; but there is no guarantee that these messages or feedback would be attended to.”

About guanyinmiao

A man of knowledge lives by acting, not by thinking about acting. Carlos Castaneda.

Discussion

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Pingback: Daily SG: 3 Jun 2016 – The Singapore Daily - June 3, 2016

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow guanyinmiao's musings on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 1,402 other followers

Twitter

  • RT @wootmygoldfish: just bc you had a different experience and threshold from someone else doesn't make it ok for you to act like they're s… 2 hours ago
  • RT @rafalklajn: What happens is you accidentally leave a manuscript in a three-years-old’s room... https://t.co/BbijdiIdEk 5 hours ago
  • RT @pauriahcarey: Yet, a huge misstep in his part was to make it all about himself, basically saying "but look i said good things also! why… 5 hours ago
  • RT @pauriahcarey: His apology on Sarah's post was great, and I was so hopeful. Pink Dot's messaging has moved from "celebrating the freedom… 5 hours ago
  • RT @pauriahcarey: I don't think Sarah Yip's post can be blamed for Tosh Zhang's decision to pull out. If you reread her post, you'll see no… 5 hours ago
%d bloggers like this: